One of the major changes saw the responsibility for enforcing safety in the North Sea from the Department of ones to the Safety and health Executive. The conflict with interest was obvious, (production and safety was driven by way of the same organisation).
A 2nd example was the Nobleman Cross underground fire. It was eventually initially difficult to explain, there had to be a proper forensic investigation which resulted in the discovery of a fluid flow phenomenon, (thats liquid and gas within motion) this subsequently explained the terrible ferocity of the fire.
For example humps were put into the road to slow down traffic high density commercial areas. Employees need to get kept as safe as you possibly can. If there is equipment to help ensure their safety it ought to be supplied by the employer. Training is also important; employees should be made alert to how to perform their own job as safely as possible.
Andrew Marshall??
.
Accident Claim, Accident Claim, Accident ClaimAn employer has a responsibility for any safety of its workforce. Health and safety isnt just in the best interest of the employee but also in the interests of the corporation. No one wants to work in a dangerous environment no company wants to have to spend for sick or hurt staff, which could have been completely easily avoided. If everyone follows the health and safety rules then accidents may be prevented.
Safety and health can also affect staff moral. If there is some sort of safety issue then staff will be unhappy about working in the environment or with some faulty equipment. IF staff see or even know of any past accidents or friend at work gets injured, that will have an impact on staff well being. This company has to provide a safe working area for staff and address any conditions may arise.
Now it isnt all to the shoulders of the company to look after staff safety but its also the responsibility of the individual. If they are trained on protection issues, like manual handling for instance, then its up on the employee to use pursue a career provided. If a employee has an issue with safety at work then they should highlight the challenge and the company should overcome it. It about working together.
There is usually one major example a company can make sure accessories is safe to use and that is certainly pat testing. Pat testing is much like a mot for portable equipment at your workplace, it stands for portable appliance testing. Pat testing has been law within the uk for many years now and every company has to follow the regulations and also show logged testing. Pat testing is implemented by qualified testers and it is hired by companys to check on equipment.
Appliances require testing regularly with take checked more then others and are put into high chance and low risk. High-risk equipment usually are things like power drills and also other powered tools and small risk things are toaster, radio and computers. The wires are checked and it checks visually, then offered a pass or are unsuccessful label.
Any workforce using high risk equipment run the risk to be seriously injured if the appliance isnt checked. A company who doesnt employ pat testers regularly is putting their staff in danger and is breaking regulations.
